Modred essays

Modred essays A messenger comes from Modred to Arthur with an ultimatum. Arthur must either leave the land, in which case there will be no fight, or he must fight Mordred. Arthur chooses the latter option, believing it is too late to turn back. Arthurs men are doing a good job with all of the fighting. His men are on the run. King Kaberentin of Cornwell breaks rank and attacks the enemy with the fourth battalion. Mordred sends two more battalions to counter-attack, and King Aguisant takes the fifth battalion into battle. Arthur takes his battalion and charges Mordreds. I dont understand why there was so much fighting back then. That definitely shows that we are born violent and not necessarily taught. Many of Arthurs knight fall dead. Finally, Arthur and Mordred meet, Mordred is dead, but not before Mordred mortally wounds Arthur. Arthur goes to the chapel and prays. Again, I dont understand why is he praying he knows hes going to die eventually. Arthurs court is no longer needed, and disappears from the world. It is just Girflet and King Arthur left Girflet is dismissed. Why do they call their house of prayer the Black Chapel? So now King Arthur is dead but not before a boat of women come and take him away? Why? What is the point of that? Why dont they have women fight? I guess because the guys fought like maniacs back then. The names got really confusing after a while, so, Hector, Lancelot, and Lionel are brothers. Gawain in Jerusalem killed King Baudegamis during the quest for the Holy Grail. (pg. 24) Bors is Hector, Lancelot, and Lionels cousin. They were all knights in Arthur court. Gawain is Arthurs nephew. Because there are so many people in this story it is very confusing to stay up on it. ...

In and Of Itself

In and Of Itself In and Of Itself In and Of Itself By Maeve Maddox A reader asks, Is the term in and of itself usually associated with a reward, complete: can the reward be either in or of itself or is the separate use insufficient. I had to puzzle over the question a bit. I think it is asking if the phrases â€Å"in itself† and â€Å"of itself† can be used separately to mean intrinsically instead of being lumped together as â€Å"in and of itself.† Yes, they can. in itself This game is  in itself an insult to anyone  who buys it. Privatisation is not  good  or bad  in itself.   The world knows that Russia currently has regular soldiers stationed within the borders of Ukraine, albeit not identified (which in itself is a breach of acknowledged rules of war).   of itself Of itself  the idea of the outflanking maneuver was neither new nor original. All change is  of itself  an evil, which ought not to be hazarded but for evident advantage.   Of itself, the plan  might  not  have been unlawful, but it could have had unfortunate repercussions. â€Å"A reward in and of itself† is a clichà © used in reference to some activity that brings little or no reward in terms of money or appreciation. For example: A person’s job can be a source of reward in and of itself. Making great music is a reward in and of itself. Our work in community building can be seen as a reward in and of itself. The expression may derive from the proverb â€Å"Virtue is its own reward.† The idiom â€Å"in and of itself† is the English version of Latin per se: â€Å"by itself.† Long used as an English adverb, per se means â€Å"by or in itself; without reference to anything else; intrinsically.† Although some modern speakers object to the use of Latin expressions as elitist, â€Å"in and of itself† is hardly an elegant replacement for per se. But it is popular: To the extent any state employee was involved in facilitating the escape, that is a crime in and of itself, and that will be fully prosecuted as a crime in and of itself, Cuomo said. [A certain financing measure] could be one part of a comprehensive plan to increase education funding, but it is not a solution in and of itself. A school plan such as an Individualized Educational Plan is insufficient documentation in and of itself to determine eligibility. â€Å"In and of itself† is one of those phrases like â€Å"each and every† and â€Å"part and parcel† that say the same thing twice. Usually it is enough to say â€Å"in itself.† I wouldn’t go so far as to condemn the expression altogether. Sometimes a speaker might want to use it as a form of emphasis. Generally speaking, however, it sounds stuffy and clichà ©d. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Expressions category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:12 Signs and Symbols You Should Knowâ€Å"As Well As† Does Not Mean â€Å"And†The 7 Types of Possessive Case